Skip to content
North Lanarkshire Counts — North Lanarkshire, in numbers.Local help →

North Lanarkshire, in numbers

Action plan

North Lanarkshire council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Practical proposed steps for North Lanarkshire.

The stages explain what should happen first. They are not promised completion dates. Funding, powers and ongoing costs need to be established before a proposal is adopted.

  1. Make the open hub easy for residents to use
  2. Give Shotts clarity about its proposed hub
  3. Connect new roads to everyday walking and cycling
  4. Check effects beyond the new road
  5. Make room for homes people can afford
  6. Connect local skills to local opportunities
  7. Target safety work where problems repeat
  8. Turn published plans into visible progress

Proposal

Make the open hub easy for residents to use

Orbiston’s first phase is open and community booking information is published.

The building can support local activity beyond the school day.

Evidence

Who could lead: North Lanarkshire Council.

  1. Start now

    Publish available spaces and accessible booking arrangements.

  2. Over the next few years

    Review affordable use with local groups.

  3. Over the longer term

    Maintain facilities and track use outside school hours.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Council project and booking page.

Measure: Separate open facilities from later construction phases.

Trade-off: School and community schedules need careful coordination.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Orbiston Community Hub →

Proposal

Give Shotts clarity about its proposed hub

The council still seeks funding for Shotts hub design and consultation.

The proposal is not a confirmed new service offer.

Evidence

Who could lead: North Lanarkshire Council.

  1. Start now

    List the services under consideration and remaining decisions.

  2. Over the next few years

    Consult residents before changing school or service arrangements.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review whether the funded design meets local access needs.

How to judge progress

Starting point: July 2026 town action plan.

Measure: Publish decision dates and funded scope.

Trade-off: Combining services may improve access for some and lengthen journeys for others.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Shotts Town Hub →

Proposal

Connect new roads to everyday walking and cycling

Ravenscraig’s access programme includes active-travel links.

Useful links need to reach homes, workplaces and public transport.

Evidence

Who could lead: North Lanarkshire Council.

  1. Start now

    Map gaps between the works and existing neighbourhoods.

  2. Over the next few years

    Complete safe crossings and onward links with each road phase.

  3. Over the longer term

    Compare everyday travel patterns after opening.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Council infrastructure programme.

Measure: Report route continuity and accessibility.

Trade-off: Road capacity alone does not make walking or cycling easier.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Ravenscraig access infrastructure →

Proposal

Check effects beyond the new road

Ravenscraig access works change connections to the wider network.

Traffic may move to other streets; this needs checking rather than assuming improvement everywhere.

Evidence

Who could lead: North Lanarkshire Council.

  1. Start now

    Record traffic at affected neighbouring junctions.

  2. Over the next few years

    Monitor journeys and crossings after each section opens.

  3. Over the longer term

    Adjust road management if residential streets face more pressure.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Published road programme and intended connections.

Measure: Use comparable before-and-after locations and periods.

Trade-off: Faster vehicle access can conflict with quiet residential streets.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Ravenscraig access infrastructure →

Proposal

Make room for homes people can afford

The average home price is £159,000 (July 2026) in North Lanarkshire council area. This is about £38,000 lower than the Scotland average for the same month.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

Who could lead: The housing and planning authorities, housing associations and developers.

  1. Start now

    Publish the local waiting list, temporary accommodation and affordable-home delivery figures together.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test proposed housing sites against affordable-home need, access to work, school places and water capacity.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check whether completed homes reduce unmet need, rather than counting planning permissions as delivery.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The average home price is £159,000 (July 2026) in North Lanarkshire council area.

Measure: Affordable homes completed, households waiting, time in temporary accommodation, and rent compared with local earnings.

Trade-off: More homes can put pressure on infrastructure and land. Affordability requirements also affect development viability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Average home price →

Proposal

Connect local skills to local opportunities

23.1% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or higher (20 March 2022) in North Lanarkshire council area. People aged 16+ with a degree or higher ranged from 17.3% in Bellshill to 34.2% in Stepps, Chryston and Muirhead — a gap of 16.9 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

Who could lead: Employers, colleges, universities and the relevant skills authority.

  1. Start now

    Compare vacancies and employer needs with training available to local residents. Start by checking the different needs in Stepps, Chryston and Muirhead and Bellshill; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Link training to real jobs, including routes for people without formal qualifications.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained employment and earnings after training, not just course starts.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 23.1% with a degree or higher; 20 March 2022. People aged 16+ with a degree or higher ranged from 17.3% in Bellshill to 34.2% in Stepps, Chryston and Muirhead — a gap of 16.9 percentage points. 20 March 2022; 21 of 21 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Sustained jobs, earnings and training completion for residents who face barriers to work.

Trade-off: Training takes time and cannot create demand for jobs on its own. Qualifications are not a complete measure of ability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 16+ with a degree or higher →

Evidence: People aged 16+ with no qualifications →

Ravenscraig access infrastructure →

Proposal

Target safety work where problems repeat

Recorded-crime figures cover the whole North Lanarkshire council area; they do not identify individual wards.

These are police-recorded crimes under Scottish counting rules. They cannot be ranked alongside the mapped incidents shown for other UK nations.

Who could lead: The local police force, council community safety team and relevant services.

  1. Start now

    Check recurring places and categories alongside local police priorities and residents’ reports.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test focused prevention and support, with a comparison period agreed before the work starts.

  3. Over the longer term

    Publish whether problems fall, move elsewhere or return, and adjust the response.

How to judge progress

Crime evidence and coverage →

Starting point: Use the dated, complete periods shown in Crime and safety; keep anti-social behaviour separate.

Measure: Comparable recorded incidents, repeat victimisation and residents’ reported experience; never a single crude league table.

Trade-off: More reporting can increase recorded crime. Enforcement and support may work differently for different problems.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Proposal

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

Who could lead: The named project owners and council scrutiny bodies.

  1. Start now

    Put the scope, owner, funding position and next milestone in one public place.

  2. Over the next few years

    Report delivery against the agreed scope and explain delays or changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check the benefits residents actually receive after completion.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The dated stages in Projects; unknown costs and funding remain unknown.

Measure: Milestones met, costs against the approved budget, and measured outcomes after delivery.

Trade-off: Delivery reporting takes staff time, but a launch announcement alone cannot show value for money.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Orbiston Community Hub →

Ravenscraig access infrastructure →

Shotts Town Hub →

From evidence to delivery